I have a couple of little things to criticize, but one that I am much more a criticism that I think the architects did not understand anything (I therefore appeal against all!). I do not know a lot of architecture, but one thing for me is essential respect for nature (since they are part) and over the years I realized that the man at the end always search its ideal habitat in nature. Just to give a silly example, you would never be a picnic in an asphalt parking lot? Do you like suffocating in cement? There is painful to see trees that are cut with no respect? Cement is alienating, it is not aggregated as a lawn . Well, then why the architects (if you can call it) who planned the last places I visited did not even know what a flower bed? An example is the square of Mira (Riviera del Brenta) ... Beautiful, new, spacious, there is even a fountain ... but there is not even a blade of grass, a plant, anything "green" ... I'd like to see who designed it, sitting in the shade of his beloved summer CEMENT! VergonateVi! (Other examples are obscene in a square where you think ... the trees have been replaced by fake trees of steel. Pay attention to how sparingly you should reserve to new flower beds or trees in parking lots etc.. And 'scandalous as it is regressing at the level of public green). I hope that future work are more human and eco-friendly! What does it take to plant a bit 'of trees or do some flower bed? Maybe it would cost even less ... What does not work is not finance, is the head of some people!
0 comments:
Post a Comment